Comments on: Kurgans – 4.000 BC

By: Medical Assistant

Medical Assistant — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:51:15 +0000

Nice and very useful information. I was seeking this particular information for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.

By: high probability trading

high probability trading — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:46:49 +0000

It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like that very much. I can feel that you paid much attention for those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. I will be…

By: Medical Billing Job

Medical Billing Job — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:50:32 +0000

So, that’s how it is. You made a great mapping out there.

By: Doctors Assistant

Doctors Assistant — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:08:04 +0000

a very good way to inform people about the culture of kurgans… thank you for sharing it with us…

By: asier

asier — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:11:39 +0000

wwe pressing catch

By: Indo-European languages of Europe » Blog Archive » When a language should be considered “artificial” or “natural” - A quick classification of ’spoken’, ‘dead’, ‘hypothetical’ and R

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:21:22 +0000

[...] Indo-European II (ca. 4000? BC), reconstructed; evolved into Proto-Indo-European III and Hittite. [Map of Kurgan culture] [...]

By: Indo-European languages of Europe » Blog Archive » When should a language be considered “artificial” or “natural”? A quick classification of ‘native’ (living and dead), ‘hypothetical’ and ‘

Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:13:29 +0000

[...] Indo-European II (ca. ?), reconstructed; evolved into Proto-Indo-European III and Hittite. [Hypothetical map - Kurgans] [...]