After some unknown prehistorical incident, Proto-Indo-Europeans – or, better, Late Proto-Indo-European dialects – expand in all directions.
After some unknown prehistorical incident, Proto-Indo-Europeans – or, better, Late Proto-Indo-European dialects – expand in all directions.
I do not see a geograhical connection with Sanskrit speaking peoples although Sanskrit would have been in use at this time. If Sanskrit is proto-indo-european it should be included on this map – should it not?
hello john
i believe that sanskrit is a step after, simple proto-indian (ind in this map)
PIE is mother tongue of all IE (within sanskrit, latin, greek, persian etc. )
but i believe that exist more ancent language, proto euroasiatic together uralic-altaic and others
I believe that the splitting of indoeuropean wasnt in russian territory early but IE before expandand and after been differentiated with several different sub-stratum.
spit into indo-iranian, balto-slav, celtic, germanic, italic, greek etc.
Hi can somebody help me to find information about Iberist Theory?
Thanks
Sanskrit is not a natural language, it is an artificial language derived from Vedic and created by Panini c. 4th century BC. Wy does everybody think it is the oldest indoeuropean language, and even the mother tongue?