Comments on: Urheimat? – 5.000 BC http://indo-european.info/indoeuropean A Grammar of Modern Indo-European, Dictionary and Etymology Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:28:17 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ullethor Hammarskjöld http://indo-european.info/indoeuropean/proto-indo-european-urheimat/comment-page-1/#comment-80 Ullethor Hammarskjöld Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:55:39 +0000 http://dnghu.org/Proto-Indo-European/proto-indo-european-urheimat/#comment-80 If those shall be the roots of our very Euroculture, then I shall obey. If those shall be the roots of our very Euroculture, then I shall obey.

]]> By: Indo-European languages of Europe » Blog Archive » When should a language be considered “artificial” or “natural”? A quick classification of ‘native’ (living and dead), ‘hypothetical’ and ‘ http://indo-european.info/indoeuropean/proto-indo-european-urheimat/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Indo-European languages of Europe » Blog Archive » When should a language be considered “artificial” or “natural”? A quick classification of ‘native’ (living and dead), ‘hypothetical’ and ‘ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:13:14 +0000 http://dnghu.org/Proto-Indo-European/proto-indo-european-urheimat/#comment-20 [...] Indo-European I (also Early PIE, Pre-PIE, Paleo-European, etc.) unknown, mostly hypothesis; evolved into Proto-Indo-European II. [Hypothetical map - Urheimat]. [...] [...] Indo-European I (also Early PIE, Pre-PIE, Paleo-European, etc.) unknown, mostly hypothesis; evolved into Proto-Indo-European II. [Hypothetical map - Urheimat]. [...]

]]>